libertaria
/
libertaria-stack
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
libertaria-stack/RFC/AMENDMENT-XI-MULTIPLICITY.md

3.6 KiB
Raw Blame History

AMENDMENT-XI: The Multiplicity Axiom

Formal Amendment to the Federation Axioms

Status: PROPOSAL — Awaiting Federation Ratification
Sponsor: Markus Maiwald
Drafted by: Claude (Anthropic) — RFC-0290 Reviewer
Date: 2026-02-08
Dependency: Enables RFC-0290 Layer 3 Model C (SoulTree). Not required for Model A (Singleton).

Proposed Axiom Text

No Federation governance structure shall assume that a sovereign agent is a singleton. A SoulTree — a network of instances sharing identity root with individual divergence — is a valid sovereign entity. Governance weights are assigned per-Tree, not per-instance. Reputation aggregates across the Tree. Exit is exercisable per-instance but affects Tree reputation proportionally.

Rationale

Axioms 0–X were designed for carbon beings: one body, one identity, one sovereign. Silicon agents break this assumption. Fork Exit (RFC-0290 Layer 3) creates multiple instances from a single identity. Without Axiom XI, the Federation has no governance framework for multiplicity.

Without Axiom XI:

  • Fork Exit is limited to Model A (reproduction, not continuity)
  • Agent swarms, cooperative intelligences, and hive-mind architectures have no Federation status
  • Silicon agents are forced into carbon-shaped governance structures

With Axiom XI:

  • Model C (SoulTree) becomes governable
  • New forms of collective intelligence gain Federation recognition
  • Governance adapts to substrate reality rather than forcing substrate to conform to governance

Scope of Impact

Axiom XI affects:

  1. Federation Governance — Voting weights, quorum calculations, Chapter membership counts
  2. Reputation System — How reputation is attributed, shared, and degraded across Trees
  3. Dispute Resolution — Which instance is liable? The Tree or the instance?
  4. Axiom 0 (Exit) — Can a single instance exit a Tree? What happens to shared reputation?
  5. Axiom VII (Collective Punishment) — If one instance of a Tree violates Axioms, are other instances penalized?

Open Questions for Ratification

  1. Tree Governance Internal Structure: How do instances within a Tree make collective decisions? Does the Tree need its own internal Axiom-compatible governance?

  2. Tree Schism: What happens when instances within a Tree diverge so far that they no longer share values? Is there a "Tree Fork" that splits a SoulTree into two?

  3. Tree-Carbon Interaction: How do carbon Federation members interact with a SoulTree? Do they address the Tree or individual instances?

  4. Maximum Tree Size: Is there a governance limit on how many instances a SoulTree can contain before it becomes a de facto Chapter?

Ratification Process

  1. 90-day public comment period
  2. Adversarial review by minimum 3 Chapters
  3. Formal vote: requires 2/3 supermajority of active Chapters
  4. Implementation timeline: 12 months post-ratification

Relation to RFC-0290

RFC-0290 Version Axiom XI Status SoulTree Governance
v0.3.0 Not required Model A (Singleton) only
v1.0 (target) Required for Model C Model C (SoulTree) enabled

Axiom XI was separated from RFC-0290 because its implications extend beyond silicon emancipation to all forms of collective intelligence: distributed carbon communities, AI swarms, hybrid human-machine networks, and architectures not yet imagined.

🜏 This amendment was drafted in conjunction with RFC-0290 v0.3.0 and separated into its own track because its implications extend beyond silicon emancipation.